||| The Militarization of Bangladesh: A Dangerous Precedent |||

Subtitle: The Implications of Expanded Military Powers for Democracy and Human Rights

Sep 18, 2024

Abstract:

This paper examines the recent decision by the interim government in Bangladesh to grant magisterial powers to commissioned officers of the army. It argues that this expansion of military authority into civilian affairs poses significant risks to the country's democratic institutions, human rights record, and the rule of law. Key concerns include the potential for abuse of power, restrictions on civil liberties, the undermining of judicial independence, and the long-term consequences for political stability. The paper concludes by recommending a series of measures to mitigate these risks and protect the fundamental principles of democracy and human rights in Bangladesh.

Keywords:

Bangladesh, military, democracy, human rights, rule of law, civilian supremacy, magisterial powers, abuse of power, civil liberties, judicial independence, militarization, political stability, Ishtiaq Anwar Ross.

Introduction:

The recent decision by the interim government in Bangladesh to grant magisterial powers to commissioned officers of the army is a significant development with far-reaching implications for the country's democratic institutions, human rights record, and the rule of law. While the government may have justified this move as a necessary measure to maintain law and order in the face of specific challenges, it raises several concerns. The expansion of military authority into civilian affairs can undermine the principles of civilian supremacy, erode the rule of law, and create a potential for human rights abuses.

MAGISTERIAL POWER-

The army is embarking on an operation with magisterial powers. The government has granted commissioned officers of the army magisterial powers. They have been given the authority of an Executive Magistrate across the country for the next 60 days.

Under the magisterial powers, the army can exercise the following authorities:

According to the provisions of Schedule-III of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, the general powers of an Executive Magistrate are:

1. The power to arrest or order the arrest and custody of a person committing an offense in the presence of the magistrate. (Section-64)

2. The power to arrest or issue a warrant for arrest. (Section-65)

3. The power to authorize a warrant or order the removal of an accused arrested under the warrant's provisions. (Sections-83, 84, 86)

4. The power to search and seize documents, etc., through postal and telegraph authorities. (Section-95)

5. The power to issue a search warrant for the search of unlawfully detained persons. (Section-100)

6. The power to conduct a direct search. (Section-105)

7. The power to require security to keep the peace. (Section-107)

8. The power to discharge individuals bound to keep the peace or good behavior. (Section-124)

9. The power to grant bail for good behavior from habitual offenders. (Section-126)

10. The power to order the dispersal of an unlawful assembly. (Section-127)

11. The power to use civilian force for dispersal. (Section-128)

12. The power to use military force for dispersing an unlawful assembly. (Section-130)

13. The power to issue an order as an immediate measure in cases of public nuisance. (Section-142)

14. The power to appoint any subordinate Executive Magistrate for local investigation. (Section-148)

In addition to the aforementioned powers, any Executive Magistrate has been empowered by the government, along with the District Magistrate, to conduct mobile courts within their respective jurisdictions under the Mobile Court Act, 2009.

In short, The Bangladesh government has temporarily expanded the authority of the military by granting commissioned officers magisterial powers. This unprecedented move allows the army to exercise a wide range of civilian law enforcement functions, including the power to arrest, detain, search, and disperse unlawful assemblies. These expanded powers are based on the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, and the Mobile Court Act, 2009.

The Bangladesh government has taken a significant step by granting commissioned officers of the army magisterial powers, effectively expanding the military's role in civilian law enforcement. This unprecedented move empowers the army to exercise a wide range of functions typically reserved for civilian authorities, including the power to arrest, detain, search, and disperse unlawful assemblies. These expanded powers are based on the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, and the Mobile Court Act, 2009.

The decision to grant the military these additional powers has raised concerns among some observers, who argue that it could lead to a erosion of civilian supremacy and the rule of law. Critics have also expressed concerns about the potential for human rights abuses, particularly given the military's history of involvement in internal security operations.

While the government may have justified this move as a necessary measure to maintain law and order in the face of specific challenges, it remains to be seen how these expanded powers will be exercised and what the long-term consequences will be for the country's democratic institutions and human rights record.

|| The Expansion of Military Powers in Bangladesh: A Critical Analysis ||

While the government may have justified this move as a necessary measure to maintain law and order in the face of specific challenges, it raises several concerns. The expansion of military authority into civilian affairs can undermine the principles of civilian supremacy, erode the rule of law, and create a potential for human rights abuses.

Key concerns include:

Potential for Abuse of Power:

The military's unique organizational structure and culture can make it more difficult to hold individuals accountable for any abuses of power. The chain of command within the military can also limit civilian oversight and accountability mechanisms.

Impact on Human Rights:

The expanded powers could lead to restrictions on civil liberties, including freedom of expression, assembly, and association. The military may be more likely to use force disproportionately or to target specific groups, particularly those perceived as threats to security.

Undermining the Rule of Law:

The army's assumption of judicial functions can weaken the independence and authority of the judiciary. The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law, protecting human rights, and ensuring that the government acts within the bounds of the law.

Long-Term Consequences:

The increasing role of the military in civilian affairs can lead to a militarization of society and political instability. When the military becomes deeply involved in civilian governance, it can become difficult to return to a more civilian-led system. This can have long-term consequences for the country's democratic development and its ability to address social and economic challenges.

It is imperative that the government carefully monitor the exercise of these expanded powers and ensure that they are used in a manner that is consistent with the principles of human rights, the rule of law, and democratic governance. The government should also consider alternative strategies for maintaining law and order that do not rely so heavily on the military.

Furthermore, it is important to engage in a broader public debate about the role of the military in a democratic society. Civil society organizations, human rights groups, and the media should play a role in monitoring the military's actions and advocating for accountability and transparency.

The expansion of military powers in Bangladesh is a dangerous trend that threatens the country's democratic institutions and the rights of its citizens. The government must take immediate steps to address the concerns raised in this paper and ensure that the military's actions are subject to civilian oversight and accountability. It is also essential for civil society organizations, human rights groups, and the media to play a vigilant role in monitoring the military's activities and advocating for the protection of democratic principles and human rights.

To mitigate the risks associated with this development, the government should consider the following measures:

1. Establish a civilian oversight body:

A civilian oversight body, independent of the military, should be created to monitor the exercise of the military's expanded powers. This body should have the authority to investigate complaints of abuse, recommend disciplinary action, and provide public reports on the military's activities.

2. Strengthen the judiciary:

The judiciary should be strengthened and made more independent to ensure that it can effectively check the military's power. This includes increasing the resources and capacity of the judiciary, protecting the independence of judges, and promoting judicial accountability.

3. Promote transparency and accountability:

The government should increase transparency and accountability in the military by requiring regular reports on military activities, ensuring public access to information, and promoting independent audits of military expenditures.

4. Engage in dialogue with civil society:

The government should engage in open dialogue with civil society organizations, human rights groups, and other stakeholders to build trust and consensus on the role of the military in a democratic society.

5. Invest in alternative security mechanisms:

The government should invest in alternative security mechanisms, such as community policing, conflict resolution, and social development programs, to reduce the reliance on the military for maintaining law and order.

By addressing these concerns and taking steps to ensure that the military's powers are exercised responsibly, the government can help to mitigate the risks associated with this decision and protect the fundamental principles of democracy and human rights in Bangladesh.

While the government may have legitimate concerns about maintaining law and order, the grant of magisterial powers to the Bangladesh Army is a cause for concern. It is essential to carefully monitor the exercise of these powers and ensure that they are used in a manner that is consistent with the principles of human rights, the rule of law, and democratic governance.

Summary:

This paper analyzes the implications of the recent expansion of military powers in Bangladesh. It highlights the potential for abuse of power, restrictions on civil liberties, the undermining of judicial independence, and the long-term consequences for political stability. The paper argues that the government must take immediate steps to address these concerns and ensure that the military's actions are subject to civilian oversight and accountability. It recommends a series of measures, including the establishment of a civilian oversight body, strengthening the judiciary, promoting transparency and accountability, engaging in dialogue with civil society, and investing in alternative security mechanisms.

Conclusion:

Hashtags:

#Bangladesh #military #democracy #humanrights #ruleoflaw #civiliancontrol #militarization #government #interimgvernment #magisterialpowers #security #lawandorder #IshtiaqAnwarRoss

Disclaimer

The Expansion of Military Powers in Bangladesh: A Critical Assessment

This paper presents a critical analysis of the recent expansion of military powers in Bangladesh by the interim government. The analysis is based on objective research and evaluation of available information.

Please note that this paper is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Any reproduction, modification, or reuse of this content without the express written consent of the author is strictly prohibited.

Ishtiaq’s Substack

Discussion about this post